Jetzt belegt schon die Wissenschaft, dass die global versprühten Chemtrails (samt Aluminium) höchst toxisch für Mensch und Naturkreislauf sind. 10 bis 20 Millionen Tonnen Aluminium sollen jährlich in der Atmosphäre eingebracht werden für eine Zeitdauer von Hunderten bis Tausenden von Jahren ohne Unterbrechung. Das ist doch völlig irre, noch niemals hat es in der gesamten Menschheitsgeschichte irgendeine Technik gegeben, die über Jahrhunderte ausgeführt werden musste.
Unsere Politiker möchten über Jahrhunderte das Wetter manipulieren.
Die Zeitdauer verschweigen Regierungen natürlich gern, um diese Forschung durch die Parlamente zu bekommen. Sie prüfen gerade in riesigen weltweiten SRM- Feldversuchen, wie giftig es wäre, den Planeten für ihre Klimazwecke zu missbrauchen. Dass ist natürlich so... in keinem Land der Welt durch die Parlamente zu bekommen. Deswegen die Geheimhaltung aller ausschlaggebenden Details.
Britische Wissenschaftler haben ermittelt, dass ein hoher Aluminiumgehalt im Organismus von Bienen das Bienensterben auslöst. In Hummel-Puppen hätten sie jedenfalls eine hohe Aluminium-Kontamination gefunden.
Eine derartige Kontamination führt bei Menschen zu Alzheimer.
Die wichtigste Umwelt-Verunreinigung der letzten Zeit ist das Metall Aluminium (5).
Besagt diese Studie.
Der Rückgang der weltweiten Bienenpopulation wird offenbar durch die hohe Kontamination von Aluminium ausgelöst, berichtet die internationale Online-Fachzeitschrift der Public Library of Science (PLOS one). Davon gehen jedenfalls Biologen von der Keele University und der University of Sussex in Großbritannien aus und untersuchen diesen Ansatz. Eine hohe Kontamination von Aluminium führt zumindest bei Menschen zur Alzheimer-Krankheit.
Weitere Faktoren spielen beim Niedergang der Bienenpopulation eine Rolle wie zum Beispiel der Mangel an Blumen oder Attacken durch Parasiten. Bisherige Studien konnten nachweisen, dass Bienen auch Nektar konsumieren, welcher Aluminium-Reste in sich hat. Sie fanden heraus, dass der Metallgehalt in Bienenpuppen von 13 bis 193 ppm reicht. Ein Aluminiumgehalt von über drei ppm löst bei Menschen die Alzheimer-Krankheit aus.
Doch EU-Wissenschaftler fanden im April heraus, dass Pestizide für das Massensterben von Bienen verantwortlich sein sollen. Die verbreitete Verwendung von Neonicotinoid-Insektiziden haben nach Angaben der EU-Wissenschaftler schwerwiegende Auswirkungen auf eine Reihe von Organismen, die für das Ökosystem unerlässlich sind.
Quelle: Deutsche Wirtschaftsnachrichten
The causes of declines in bees and other pollinators remains an on-going debate. While recent attention has focussed upon pesticides, other environmental pollutants have largely been ignored. Aluminium is the most significant environmental contaminant of recent times and we speculated that it could be a factor in pollinator decline. Herein we have measured the content of aluminium in bumblebee pupae taken from naturally foraging colonies in the UK. Individual pupae were acid-digested in a microwave oven and their aluminium content determined using transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Pupae were heavily contaminated with aluminium giving values between 13.4 and 193.4 μg/g dry wt. and a mean (SD) value of 51.0 (33.0) μg/g dry wt. for the 72 pupae tested. Mean aluminium content was shown to be a significant negative predictor of average pupal weight in colonies. While no other statistically significant relationships were found relating aluminium to bee or colony health, the actual content of aluminium in pupae are extremely high and demonstrate significant exposure to aluminium. Bees rely heavily on cognitive function and aluminium is a known neurotoxin with links, for example, to Alzheimer’s disease in humans. The significant contamination of bumblebee pupae by aluminium raises the intriguing spectre of cognitive dysfunction playing a role in their population decline.
There is on-going debate as to the causes and extent of declines of bees and other pollinators, with a growing consensus that pollinators are subject to a number of interacting stressors, including exposure to pesticides, infection with native and emerging pathogens, and declining abundance and diversity of floral resources [1–3]. Aside from pesticides, little attention has been paid to quantifying exposure to or impacts of other pollutants [4].
The most significant environmental contaminant of recent times is the metal aluminium [5]. Human activities such as the burning of fossil fuels resulting in ‘acid rain’, intensive agriculture producing acid sulphate soils and the mining of aluminium ores to make aluminium metal and salts have all contributed to the burgeoning biological availability of this non-essential metal [6]. Fish, trees, arable crops and humans are all impacted by aluminium and recent evidence suggests, at least, that bees are not immune to its increasing prevalence in the biotic cycle. For example, while there are very few data it has been shown that pollen is heavily contaminated with aluminium with analyses from Brazil indicating a mean content of 96μg/g [7]. Recent research has suggested that nectar may also be contaminated with aluminium and in experiments where nectar was replaced with a sugar solution spiked with aluminium bumblebees continued to forage and ingest this potentially toxic resource [8].
However, we do not know how commonly bees are exposed to aluminium, and no studies have investigated whether such exposure may contribute to bee health problems. Here, we quantify the concentration of aluminium in bumblebee pupae taken from colonies that had been foraging naturally in the UK landscape. We also examine whether aluminium concentration correlates with measures of colony fitness.
In May 2013, 20 commercially produced Bombus terrestris audax colonies were acquired from Biobest NV. Belgium. Each colony was numbered randomly upon arrival, the biogluc (glucose solution) bottles with which they are supplied and any accessible pollen were removed, and the colonies were assigned and transferred to different sites (in urban and rural locations) in the East Sussex landscape (Table 1). The bumblebee nests assigned to urban sites were placed in gardens within sizeable urban/suburban areas (the smallest of which was Henfield, population ~5,000). Rural nests were placed on farmland, with less than 5% of the surrounding circle of 1 km radius comprised of gardens. No specific permission was required to carry out these studies and the bumblebee is not an endangered or protected species in the UK. The colonies were then left to develop for 10 weeks in the field, during which they were monitored and weighed every 2 weeks. At the end of the 10-week period, all surviving colonies were collected and immediately frozen at -80°C until dead. All queens, workers, males, and pupae were removed, counted and weighed, adult thorax width was measured (between the widest points at the base of the wing), and all individuals were stored at -20°C.
Frozen pupae were allowed to thaw naturally in the laboratory in plastic Petri dishes. Each pupa was then subjected to a cleaning process which involved its immersion in 1 mM citric acid solution for 60 seconds followed by a subsequent immersion in ultra-pure water (conductivity < 0.067 μS/cm) for a further 60 seconds. The pupa was then blotted dry using filter paper and incubated at 37°C until it achieved a constant dry weight, usually taking 48–72 hours. Immersion in citric acid solution was used to remove any surface-associated aluminium and this procedure followed by the wash with ultra-pure water ensured that only tissue aluminium was measured in all subsequent analyses. Weighed pupae were then digested in a 1:1 mixture of 15.8M HNO3 and 30% w/v H2O2 in a microwave oven using an established method [9]. The resulting digests were transparent and made up to 20% HNO3 using ultra-pure water. Total aluminium in each digest was measured by transversely heated graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (TH GFAAS) using a method developed in CE’s laboratory. Quality assurance data including the use of method blanks to account for incidental contamination have been published previously [9].
Of the 20 colonies, the queens died prematurely in four. We tested the effect of site (urban or rural) and latitude on aluminium content found in the 20 bumblebee colonies (aluminium extracted from 2 to 5 pupae per colony). We further tested the response of peak colony weight, average worker/male/pupae weight, adult thorax width, and number of queens produced, to mean aluminium content, using only the 16 colonies in which the foundress queens survived. Data were analysed in R using Generalized Linear Models with quasipoisson errors (to account for under-dispersion of data) with measures of colony performance (peak colony weight; mean male weight; mean pupal weight; thorax size of workers, males, or queens; number of queens produced per colony) with mean aluminium content per nest, and the initial weight of each nest as covariates. Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons were applied.
Data were obtained on 2–5 pupae from 20 different colonies (mean ± SD; 3.6 ± 0.9). The aluminium content of individual pupae ranged from 13.4 to 193.4 μg/g dry wt. (Table 1). The mean (SD) aluminium content of all 72 pupae was 51.0 (33.0) μg/g dry wt. The aluminium content of pupae varied significantly from colony to colony with the range of the colony means (SD) being from 16.3 (2.6) for Colony 3 to 149.4 (44.7) μg/g dry wt. for Colony 1 (ANOVA, F19,52 = 13.5, p<0.001).
A greater, although not significant, amount of aluminium was found in urban colonies (mean 49.7 ± 34.2 SD) compared with rural (41.9 ± 19.3 SD). However, this result was due to a single colony, Colony 1, which was located in an urban garden in Uckfield (Table 2) and had an unusually high detected-level of aluminium for this dataset (note that colony 51 also had unusually high levels of Al, but was excluded from analyses as the queen died prematurely). Once this colony was removed, aluminium content in urban (42.5 ± 19.5 SD) and rural sites were similar. Due to this outlier, further analyses excluded Colony 1.
Aluminiumoxyde werden täglich in der Atmosphäre versprüht..
US Patent 5003186
Stratosphären-Welsbach Aussaat zur Reduktion der globalen Erwärmung
Chang, et al.
26. März 1991
Dane Wigington GeoengineeringWatch.org >>> Warum sterben die Bienen?
Wegen dem Bienenvölker-Kollaps. Und ich habe wegen den Bienen mit den wichtigsten Behörden des Landes gesprochen, aber sie wollten nicht hinsehen. Man untersucht auf schädliche chemische Substanzen, aber warum sterben Bienen in 1.600 km Höhe auf einem Berg? Wir haben eine Studie seit 2010, die besagt, dass 1.000 Wale der entlegensten Gebiete des Planeten, ich zitiere: "Erstaunliche Mengen von Aluminium in ihrem Gewebe hatten". Der Bienenvölker-Kollaps scheint am klarsten mit Geo-Engineering und den Radiowellen/ Mikrowellenstrahlung verknüpft zu sein.
Dane Wigington >>> Es gibt keinen Ort, um sich davor zu verstecken.
Geoengineering, Klima-Krieg und biologische Kriegsführung